On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 8:23 AM, Andrew MacLeod <amacl...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 11/07/2013 05:36 AM, Basile Starynkevitch wrote: >> >> On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 11:26:46AM -0500, Andrew MacLeod wrote: >>> >>> I decided to name the new file gimple-expr.[ch] instead of >>> gimple-decl.... This will eventually split into gimple-type.[ch], >>> gimple-decl.[ch], and gimple-expr.[ch]. >> >> >> Since we are adding *new* C++ files, can't we please name them *.cc >> for the implementation part, so at least create gimple-expr.h and >> gimple-expr.cc but not gimple-expr.c, please! > > Assuming we put this into stage 1 next year, I would imagine we'd rename a > number of things, including .cc, drop the tree-* from the tree-ssa-blah.[c]h > files, etc etc. There have been a few things people have suggested > renaming... I think if we do renaming, they ought to be all at one time to > minimize the pain. > > At the moment, the new gimple-* files I'm creating are still C, so they are > .c files...
Agreed. When we start shuffling files around seems a better time. Doing both operations at once will be easier than going through two phases of naming changes. Diego.