On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 10:07 PM, Andrew MacLeod <amacl...@redhat.com> wrote:
> This one covers the front end files which included gimple.h
>
> Bootstraps on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu with no new regressions. OK?
* c-family/c-omp.c: Include gimple-expr.h instead of gimple.h.
can you explain why gimple-expr.h is not as bad as gimple.h?
(gimple-expr.h sounds oxymoronish ... but I didn't follow the thread
that ended up creating this beast, it seems a better matching name
would be gimple-tree.h ... haha).
Otherwise gimple.h -> gimplify.h indeed looks like an improvement.
Thanks,
Richard.
> Andrew
