On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 8:22 PM, Mike Stump <mikest...@comcast.net> wrote: > Richi has asked the we break the wide-int patch so that the individual port > and front end maintainers can review their parts without have to go through > the entire patch. This patch covers the i386 port.
Should this patch also address construction of 128bit immediates? One example is in ix86_build_signbit_mask, where we have to use special tricks to create them. You can find other interesting places by grepping config/i386/* sources for HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT checks. These remains from times when wide_int was 32 for i686 host, and IMO should be addressed by wide-int patch. Thanks, Uros.
