On 11/23/2013 08:20 PM, Mike Stump wrote: > Richi has asked the we break the wide-int patch so that the individual port > and front end maintainers can review their parts without have to go through > the entire patch. This patch covers the bfin port. > > Ok?
I haven't seen any updates on the compile-time regressions with the wide-int patches (but may have overlooked them in the flood). bfin and reload parts are conditionally approved if new numbers are posted and there's consensus that they are acceptable. Bernd
