On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 2:07 AM, Kenneth Zadeck <zad...@naturalbridge.com> wrote: > We will of course measure it but the only thing that is different because of > the conversion is that timode integers are packaged differently
Yeah, the slowness is due to generic code modification, not a port using CONST_WIDE_INT or not. Richard. > > >> On Nov 26, 2013, at 6:17 PM, David Edelsohn <dje....@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 5:46 PM, Mike Stump <mikest...@comcast.net> wrote: >>> >>> Ok? >> >> The revised version of the patch looks okay from a technical >> perspective, but I still am concerned about the compile-time impact. I >> thought that I saw a comment on IRC that wide-int seems to have a 3-5% >> compile time impact, which is a concern. I am concerned about the >> rs6000 port being further slowed with respect to other targets. >> >> Thanks, David
