On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 9:56 AM, Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 09:51:38AM -0800, H.J. Lu wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 5:36 AM, Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote: >> > On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 11:51:55AM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote: >> >> It's only safe to free the targs if they weren't used to instantiate >> >> any templates, so I lean toward option #1. Did you test this with >> >> strict gc? >> > >> > Ok, after IRC discussion and another bootstrap/regtest I've installed >> > this variant instead: >> > >> > 2013-12-12 Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> >> > >> > PR c++/58627 >> > * call.c (add_template_candidate_real): Don't call ggc_free on >> > targs. >> >> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >> >> This checkin doesn't match its ChangeLog entry and it doesn't fix > > I have fixed up the function name in the ChangeLog entry. > > As for the stdc++.cc failure, I've commented in the PR, it is PCH related,
The filename is class.c, not call.c. -- H.J.
