On 01/15/2014 01:58 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 01:43:18PM -0800, Richard Henderson wrote:
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr54694.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
>> +/* { dg-do compile } */
>> +/* { dg-options "-O" } */
>> +
>> +register void *hfp __asm__("%ebp"); /* { dg-message "note: for" } */
>
> Shouldn't that be %rbp for x86_64? Or do we treat it the same?We treat it the same. r~
