On 01/17/2014 11:26 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
On 01/08/2014 03:57 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
What about the attached version? It still does not exactly match your
original suggestion because gimple_call_lhs (stmt) can be NULL_TREE if
the result is ignored and this case needs instrumentation, as you
explained, so I use the function return type in the aggregate_value_p
check.
Testing is still under way, but looks good so far. I'm bootstrapping
with BOOT_CFLAGS="-O2 -g -fstack-protector-strong" with Ada enabled, for
additional coverage.
Testing passed without new regressions. Is this okay for trunk?
Ping? Thanks.
--
Florian Weimer / Red Hat Product Security Team
