On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 07:01:03PM -0500, David Edelsohn wrote: > On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 5:18 PM, Alan Modra <amo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Shouldn't addr_op2 also be set from find_replacement?
Sorry, I thought after I sent the email that I should have added some explanation of why certain parts need find_replacement and others don't. We want just those parts of addresses that might have been reloaded. There's the case of the entire address being reloaded (actually, I'm not sure this one is needed) and then all the ones we do in the rs6000 backend in legitimize_reload_address. I think I found all the required parts but it certainly won't hurt if you check too. Calling find_replacement when not strictly necessary will slow down gcc a little.. -- Alan Modra Australia Development Lab, IBM
