On 5 March 2014 21:35, Marc Glisse wrote: > On Wed, 5 Mar 2014, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > >> Please put _GLIBCXX_RESOLVE_DEFECTS (or whatever >> it is we use elsewhere) in the comment, rather than just "DR 2106". I >> think the point of that is to be able to grep for all DR fixes >> (especially ones that aren't actually accepted as defects yet :-) > > > Believe it or not, I did look at other occurences in the code, and didn't > hit any that used such a keyword. Now that I know to look for it, there is > indeed _GLIBCXX_RESOLVE_LIB_DEFECTS (I'll add it), but it is missing in a > lot of places.
That's the one. I know I've not always been consistent about adding it, but I try to when I remember.
