> -----Original Message----- > From: Tobias Burnus [mailto:bur...@net-b.de] > Sent: Saturday, March 8, 2014 3:06 PM > To: Iyer, Balaji V; Gerald Pfeifer > Cc: gcc-patches; Jakub Jelinek > Subject: Re: [wwwdocs] RFC - mention Cilk Plus in the GCC 4.9 release notes > > Tobias Burnus wrote: > > Iyer, Balaji V wrote: > >> Thank you for catching this. Yes, it should be ABI 1.1 > > Actually, shouldn't this ABI 1.2? On http://www.cilkplus.org/ - one finds the > statement: "The new specification (version 1.2) contains numerous > corrections and clarifications. No new features were added, but the existing > features are much more precisely described." - Hence, ABI 1.1 should also > match ABI version 1.2.
1.2 is 1.1 ABI with the language spec reformatted. No new features has been added in between 1.1 and 1.2. So, you can say either one. > > Or should we simply remove the ABI version completely? I have attached > such a patch? > I would put the ABI version, since the Cilk users will ask for it. > OK for the trunk / the webserver? > > Tobias >
