The changes are consistent with what is currently in upstream. So there is no additional work required
2014-04-09 17:31 GMT+04:00 Iyer, Balaji V <balaji.v.i...@intel.com>: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Jakub Jelinek [mailto:ja...@redhat.com] >> Sent: Wednesday, April 9, 2014 9:29 AM >> To: Iyer, Balaji V >> Cc: Alexander Ivchenko; Richard Biener; GCC Patches >> Subject: Re: Fix PR60644 >> >> On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 01:23:59PM +0000, Iyer, Balaji V wrote: >> > >> > >> > > -----Original Message----- >> > > From: Jakub Jelinek [mailto:ja...@redhat.com] >> > > Sent: Wednesday, April 9, 2014 8:06 AM >> > > To: Alexander Ivchenko >> > > Cc: Richard Biener; GCC Patches; Iyer, Balaji V >> > > Subject: Re: Fix PR60644 >> > > >> > > On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 03:46:13PM +0400, Alexander Ivchenko wrote: >> > > > ping.. >> > > >> > > I guess it really depends on whether the libcilkrts sources are >> > > going to be (semi?)regularly imported from some upstream repository >> > > or not, and if the upstream is willing to accept these changes. >> > > >> > >> > Yes. >> >> So, are you ok with the changes and will you handle propagating them >> upstream once they are committed to GCC? >> If yes, the patch is preapproved. > > Yes, I am Ok with the changes. We will check the patch in soon that will fix > this error. > >> >> Jakub