On Mon, 2014-04-21 at 18:45 -0400, Trevor Saunders wrote:
> > --- a/gcc/tree-loop-distribution.c
> > +++ b/gcc/tree-loop-distribution.c
> > @@ -687,8 +687,9 @@ generate_loops_for_partition (struct loop *loop, 
> > partition_t partition,
> >             }
> >           else if (gimple_code (stmt) == GIMPLE_SWITCH)
> >             {
> > +             gimple_switch switch_stmt = stmt->as_a_gimple_switch ();
> 
> maybe it would make more sense to do
> else if (gimple_switch switch_stmt = stmt->dyn_cast_gimple_switch ())

Thanks.  Yes, or indeed something like:

  else if (gimple_switch switch_stmt = dyn_cast <gimple_switch> (stmt))

(modulo the "pointerness" issues mentioned in 
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01334.html )

Reply via email to