See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60896 for bug report.

The cause of PR60896 is that those statements in PATTERN_DEF_SEQ in
pre-recognized widen-mult pattern are not forwarded to later
recognized dot-product pattern.

Another issue is that the def types of statements in PATTERN_DEF_SEQ
are assigned with the def type of the pattern statement. This is
incorrect for reduction pattern statement, in which case all
statements in PATTERN_DEF_SEQ will all be vect_reduction_def, and none
of them will be vectorized later. The def type of statement in
PATTERN_DEF_SEQ should always be vect_internal_def.

The patch is attached. Bootstrapped and tested on a x86_64 machine.

OK for trunk?


thanks,
Cong
diff --git a/gcc/ChangeLog b/gcc/ChangeLog
index 117cdd0..0af5e16 100644
--- a/gcc/ChangeLog
+++ b/gcc/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+2014-04-23  Cong Hou  <co...@google.com>
+
+       PR tree-optimization/60896
+       * tree-vect-patterns.c (vect_recog_dot_prod_pattern): Pick up
+       all statements in PATTERN_DEF_SEQ in recognized widen-mult pattern.
+       (vect_mark_pattern_stmts): Set the def type of all statements in
+       PATTERN_DEF_SEQ as vect_internal_def.
+
 2014-04-23  David Malcolm  <dmalc...@redhat.com>
 
        * is-a.h: Update comments to reflect the following changes to the
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
index 62b07f4..55bc842 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2014-04-23  Cong Hou  <co...@google.com>
+
+       PR tree-optimization/60896
+       * g++.dg/vect/pr60896.cc: New test.
+
 2014-04-23  Jeff Law  <l...@redhat.com>
 
        PR tree-optimization/60902
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/vect/pr60896.cc 
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/vect/pr60896.cc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..c6ce68b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/vect/pr60896.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O3" } */
+
+struct A
+{
+  int m_fn1 ();
+  short *m_fn2 ();
+};
+
+struct B
+{
+  void *fC;
+};
+
+int a, b;
+unsigned char i;
+void fn1 (unsigned char *p1, A &p2)
+{
+  int c = p2.m_fn1 ();
+  for (int d = 0; c; d++)
+    {
+      short *e = p2.m_fn2 ();
+      unsigned char *f = &p1[0];
+      for (int g = 0; g < a; g++)
+       {
+         int h = e[0];
+         b += h * f[g];
+       }
+    }
+}
+
+void fn2 (A &p1, A &p2, B &p3)
+{
+  int j = p2.m_fn1 ();
+  for (int k = 0; j; k++)
+    if (0)
+      ;
+    else
+      fn1 (&i, p1);
+  if (p3.fC)
+    ;
+  else
+    ;
+}
diff --git a/gcc/tree-vect-patterns.c b/gcc/tree-vect-patterns.c
index 5daaf24..365cf01 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-vect-patterns.c
+++ b/gcc/tree-vect-patterns.c
@@ -392,6 +392,8 @@ vect_recog_dot_prod_pattern (vec<gimple> *stmts, tree 
*type_in,
       gcc_assert (STMT_VINFO_DEF_TYPE (stmt_vinfo) == vect_internal_def);
       oprnd00 = gimple_assign_rhs1 (stmt);
       oprnd01 = gimple_assign_rhs2 (stmt);
+      STMT_VINFO_PATTERN_DEF_SEQ (vinfo_for_stmt (last_stmt))
+         = STMT_VINFO_PATTERN_DEF_SEQ (stmt_vinfo);
     }
   else
     {
@@ -3065,8 +3067,7 @@ vect_mark_pattern_stmts (gimple orig_stmt, gimple 
pattern_stmt,
            }
          gimple_set_bb (def_stmt, gimple_bb (orig_stmt));
          STMT_VINFO_RELATED_STMT (def_stmt_info) = orig_stmt;
-         STMT_VINFO_DEF_TYPE (def_stmt_info)
-           = STMT_VINFO_DEF_TYPE (orig_stmt_info);
+         STMT_VINFO_DEF_TYPE (def_stmt_info) = vect_internal_def;
          if (STMT_VINFO_VECTYPE (def_stmt_info) == NULL_TREE)
            STMT_VINFO_VECTYPE (def_stmt_info) = pattern_vectype;
        }

Reply via email to