Hi, On Mon, 12 May 2014, David Malcolm wrote:
> The "gfoo" type names are pleasantly terse, though I'm a little unhappy > about how they no longer match the prefix of the accessor functions e.g. > gimple_switch_num_labels (const gswitch *gs) > vs > gimple_switch_num_labels (const gimple_switch *gs) > But it works. That could also be changed with a followup to make it consistent again (i.e. rename the accessors to gswitch_num_labels). I'd be in favor of such renaming later. Ciao, Michael.
