On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 6:00 PM, Joseph S. Myers
<jos...@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> In general, vectorization tests whose expectations on x86 depend on
> whather AVX is available should only consider AVX available if
> -mprefer-avx128 is not enabled.  Some of the effective-target
> functions in target-supports.exp handle this properly, but
> check_effective_target_vect_sizes_32B_16B does not do so, resulting in
> various test failures in configurations with -mprefer-avx128.
>
> This patch makes check_effective_target_vect_sizes_32B_16B follow
> other functions in checking check_prefer_avx128.  It fixes the
> following failures for x86_64-linux-gnu --with-arch=bdver3
> --with-tune=bdver3.  OK to commit?
>
> FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-over-widen-1.c scan-tree-dump-times vect 
> "vect_recog_over_widening_pattern: detected" 8
> FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-over-widen-4.c scan-tree-dump-times vect 
> "vect_recog_over_widening_pattern: detected" 8
> FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/slp-perm-9.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorized 1 loops" 
> 2
> FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/slp-perm-9.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorizing stmts 
> using SLP" 1
> FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-over-widen-1.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects  
> scan-tree-dump-times vect "vect_recog_over_widening_pattern: detected" 8
> FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-over-widen-4.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects  
> scan-tree-dump-times vect "vect_recog_over_widening_pattern: detected" 8
> FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/slp-perm-9.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects  scan-tree-dump-times 
> vect "vectorized 1 loops" 2
> FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/slp-perm-9.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects  scan-tree-dump-times 
> vect "vectorizing stmts using SLP" 1
>
> (I still see some gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ failures that are unchanged
> by this patch: costmodel-vect-31.c, costmodel-vect-68.c and
> costmodel-fast-math-vect-pr29925.c.)
>
> 2014-05-10  Joseph Myers  <jos...@codesourcery.com>
>
>         * lib/target-supports.exp
>         (check_effective_target_vect_sizes_32B_16B): Return false if
>         128-bit AVX vectors preferred.

This is OK.

Thanks,
Uros.

Reply via email to