On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 5:23 AM, Hans-Peter Nilsson <h...@bitrange.com> wrote:
> I'm not defending the existing solution, I was observing your
> patch breaking it.  The obvious fix is adjustments by means of
> this existing machinery; done.  I suggest breakages be fixed
> without shooting messengers or requiring jumping through even
> stupider hoops in order to fix an obvious immediate breakage.
>
> If you take issue with that machinery, that's a separate issue
> which shouldn't be holding up fixing a breakage.

Sorry, I didn't mean to imply that any of this is your fault, on the
contrary I'm happy to have prompt reports from targets I don't use
myself. Thanks for fixing it!

-- 
Janne Blomqvist

Reply via email to