Re: [PATCH][RFC] Gate loop passes group on number-of-loops > 1, add no-loops group

[Jakub Jelinek]

On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 12:42:19PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> Any comments?  Does such followup sound realistic or would it be
> better to take the opportunity to move IVOPTs a bit closer to
> RTL expansion and avoid that "pass_tree_no_loop hack"?

I think it is fine to have pass_tree_no_loop pass pipeline.

        Jakub