On 07/26/2014 03:04 AM, Braden Obrzut wrote:
On 07/25/2014 05:24 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:Fair enough, but in that case let's use 'sorry' rather then 'error' to be clear that it's a missing feature.Tests like g++.dg/cpp1y/pr59638.C produce extra failures if this is changed. Is there something I'm supposed to do to account for that?
Changing dg-error to dg-message should cover it. Jason