On 23/07/14 22:33 +0200, François Dumont wrote:
On 27/06/2014 21:48, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Hi,
On 06/27/2014 07:33 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
I didn't see an obvious fix (I'm not sure if the templated constructor
can deduce its argument since the change) but have been out all day
and not had a chance to look into it.
Ok, thanks. I'm reverting the last two libstdc++-v3 commits.
Paolo.
Hi
Back from vacation, ready to have this patch committed eventually.
Here is the new version with the missing default and copy constructor.
I have a small question regarding some code next to the one I am
modifying in this patch. I can see lines like:
propagating_allocator() noexcept = default;
When using a default implementation shouldn't we let the compiler
decide if it should be noexcept or not depending on the member fields
or base class default constructors ?
Tested under Linux x86_64.
Ok to commit ?
OK, thanks.