On 07/30/2014 03:00 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
+ /* Fail if parms are left and they don't have default values and
+ they aren't all deduced as empty packs, eg (c++/57397):
+
+ template<class T1, class... Tn, class... Tm>
+ void foo(T1, Tn..., Tm...);
+
+ int main()
+ {
+ foo(1);
+ } */
Let's drop the testcase from the comment, and add a mention that this is parallel to sufficient_parms_p. OK with that change, thanks.
Jason
