On 08/05/2014 10:48 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
+ && (VOID_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (type1)) + || comptypes (TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT (TREE_TYPE (type0)), + TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT (TREE_TYPE (type1)), + COMPARE_BASE | COMPARE_DERIVED))))
Can we drop this now that we're calling composite_pointer_type? Jason
