On Wed, 2014-08-13 at 07:44 -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 08/06/14 11:20, David Malcolm wrote:
> > gcc/
> > * function.h (struct rtl_data): Strengthen field
> > "x_parm_birth_insn" from rtx to rtx_insn *.
> > * function.c (struct assign_parm_data_all): Strengthen fields
> > "first_conversion_insn" and "last_conversion_insn" from rtx to
> > rtx_insn *.
> OK. I think at this point any patch which merely changes the type of
> some variable or in a signature from rtx to rtx_insn (or any of the
> concrete passes) is considered trivial enough to go forward without
^^^^^^
Presumably you meant "subclasses" here, right?
> explicit review.
>
> That applies to patches in this series, additions you may need to make
> due to changes in the tree since you last rebased and further
> strengthening you or anyone else may want to tackle.
Heh - indeed, patch #30 needs a trivial fixup of the return type of the
helper function
emit_note_eh_region_end
that was added in r212171, from rtx to rtx_note *.
[yes, I'm working on rebasing it all against today's trunk right now]
Thanks
Dave
