OK to 4.8 then?
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 6:36 PM, Richard Biener <richard.guent...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 7:34 AM, Joey Ye <joey.ye...@gmail.com> wrote: >> PR60484 is marked as 4.7/4.8 regression and it is reported against 4.8 >> recently by an user. >> >> OK backporting to 4.7/4.8? > > The 4.7 branch is closed. > > Richard. > >> - Joey >> >> On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 1:43 AM, Joseph S. Myers >> <jos...@codesourcery.com> wrote: >>> On Fri, 14 Mar 2014, Marek Polacek wrote: >>> >>>> This patch makes sure that we set the directory prefix of >>>> dump_base_name only once, otherwise we'd end up with invalid path, >>>> resulting in error: could not open dump file ... >>>> This happened because finish_options is called for every optimize >>>> attribute and once more for command line options and every time it >>>> added the directory prefix. >>>> >>>> Regtested/bootstrapped on x86_64-linux, ok for trunk? >>> >>> OK, though I think it might be better to use separate fields of >>> gcc_options for the originally specified name and the prefixed version. >>> >>> -- >>> Joseph S. Myers >>> jos...@codesourcery.com
