Hi, On 09/02/2014 04:28 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 09/02/2014 10:17 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:Let's see if I can tease the case out...I think you need to leave that hunk alone, and instead fix the new testcase by treating = {} more like {}, just as we already don't require a copy constructor call for copy-list-initialization.
I see. Thanks a lot for the tip! Paolo.
