Hi again,

On 08/26/2014 10:54 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Hi,

On 08/26/2014 10:52 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
That seems like a good idea, but I'm not convinced there's any benefit
in Ed's changes to do:

-#if __cplusplus > 201103L
+#if __cplusplus >= 201402L

It seems like unnecessary churn to me,
about this, I had the same thought ;)
By the way, in case isn't already clear, it occurs to me that the kind of change proposed by Ed, thus standardize on __cplusplus >= "required version", will make more sense when the C++17 Standard will be closer. So far, since we can simply do everything with only 201103L, my idea too of adding _GLIBCXX_CXX11 & co seems quite pointless.

Paolo.

Reply via email to