Ping?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tony Wang [mailto:tony.w...@arm.com]
> Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2014 10:16 AM
> To: 'gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org'
> Cc: Richard Earnshaw; Ramana Radhakrishnan
> Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/3,ARM,libgcc]Code size optimization for the fmul/fdiv
> and dmul/ddiv function in libgcc
>
> Ping 2?
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Tony Wang [mailto:tony.w...@arm.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 2:02 PM
> > To: 'gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org'
> > Cc: Richard Earnshaw; Ramana Radhakrishnan
> > Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/3,ARM,libgcc]Code size optimization for the fmul/fdiv
> > and dmul/ddiv function in
libgcc
> >
> > Ping?
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Tony Wang [mailto:tony.w...@arm.com]
> > > Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2014 2:15 PM
> > > To: 'gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org'
> > > Subject: [PATCH 2/3,ARM,libgcc]Code size optimization for the fmul/fdiv
> > > and dmul/ddiv function in libgcc
> > >
> > > Step 2: Mark all the symbols around the fragment boundaries as function
> > > symbols, so as to generate
veneer
> > > when the two section is too far away from each other. Also, I have both
> > > manually and using some test
cases
> to
> > > verify that IP and PSR are not alive at such point.
> > >
> > > gcc/libgcc/ChangeLog:
> > > 2014-8-21 Tony Wang <tony.w...@arm.com>
> > >
> > > * config/arm/ieee754-sf.S: Expose symbols around fragment
> > > boundaries as function symbols.
> > > * config/arm/ieee754-df.S: Same with above
> > >
> > > BR,
> > > Tony
