On 27/09/14 08:56, Andrew Haley wrote: > I may be guilty of missing a crucial point here, but: why do we care > about having a small limit of static TLS variables? > > We surely could allocate, say, a megabyte of static TLS for each > thread. We already allocate 64M for the thread-local malloc arena,
On 64-bit systems, I mean. > after all. It doesn't cost anything beyond a little address space. > > What am I missing? > > Andrew. >
