On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 10:36:34AM -0700, Alexey Samsonov wrote:
> > Would we accept -fsanitize-recover=undefined
> > -fno-sanitize-recover=signed-integer-overflow
> > as recovering everything but signed integer overflows, i.e. the decision
> > whether to recover a particular call would check similar bitmask as
> > is checked whether to sanitize something at all?
>
> Yes, the logic for creating a set of recoverable sanitizers should be
> the same as the logic for creating a set of enabled sanitizers.
LGTM, will hack it up soon in GCC then.
Jakub
