On 10/21/14 14:19, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
Some things don't fit into nice categories that apply to a larger set of
tests, or which are somewhat random like ptxas tool failures. For these
I've added xfails and skips.


Bernd

ts-xfails.diff


        gcc/testsuite/
        * lib/target-supports.exp (check_effective_target_trampolines,
        check_profiling_available, check_effective_target_lto,
        check_effective_target_vect_natural): False for nvptx-*-*.
        * gcc.c-torture/compile/limits-fndefn.c: Skip for nvptx-*-*.
        * gcc.c-torture/compile/pr34334.c: Likewise.
        * gcc.c-torture/compile/pr37056.c: Likewise.
        * gcc.c-torture/compile/pr39423-1.c: Likewise.
        * gcc.c-torture/compile/pr46534.c: Likewise.
        * gcc.c-torture/compile/pr49049.c: Likewise.
        * gcc.c-torture/compile/pr59417.c: Likewise.
        * gcc.c-torture/compile/20080721-1.c: Likewise.
        * gcc.c-torture/compile/920501-4.c: Likewise.
        * gcc.c-torture/compile/921011-1.c: Likewise.   
        * gcc.dg/20040813-1.c: Likewise.
        * gcc.dg/pr28755.c: Likewise.
        * gcc.dg/pr44194-1.c: Likewise.
        * gcc.c-torture/compile/pr42717.c: Xfail for nvptx-*-*.
        * gcc.c-torture/compile/pr61684.c: Likewise.
        * gcc.c-torture/compile/pr20601-1.c: Likewise.
        * gcc.c-torture/compile/pr59221.c: Likewise.
        * gcc.c-torture/compile/20060208-1.c: Likewise.
        * gcc.c-torture/execute/pr52129.c: Likewise.
        * gcc.c-torture/execute/20020310-1.c: Likewise.
        * gcc.c-torture/execute/20101011-1.c: Define DO_TEST to 0 for nvptx.
        * gcc.c-torture/execute20020312-2.c: Add case for for nvptx.
        * gcc.c-torture/compile/pr60655-1.c: Don't add -fdata-sections
        for nvptx-*-*.
        * gcc.dg/pr36400.c: Xfail scan-assembler test on nvptx-*-*.
        * gcc.dg/const-elim-2.c: Likewise.
More ptx tooling failures than I'd expect. I'll leave it up to you whether or not to push on NVidia to fix some of those failures. The timeouts seem particularly troublesome.

I think this is fine.

jeff


Reply via email to