> Agreed, I think the value of 100 was set decade ago by Zdenek and me
> completely artifically. I do not recall any serious tuning of this flag.

Are you talking bout PARAM_MAX_COMPLETELY_PEELED_INSNS here?  If so, see:
  https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-11/msg01193.html

We have experienced performance regressions because of this arbitrary change 
and bumped it back to 200 unconditionally.

-- 
Eric Botcazou

Reply via email to