Joseph Myers <jos...@codesourcery.com> writes:
[...]
>> Neither Per nor Tom are active in GCC anymore. If the FE maintainers
>> do not feel comfortable reviewing line-map changes, could you nominate
>> Dodji as line-map maintainer if he is willing to accept it? I think he
>> is currently the person that understands that code best.
>
> I think Dodji as diagnostics maintainer is better placed than I am to
> review line-map patches.
Thanks Joseph,
As Manuel said at:
Manuel López-Ibáñez <lopeziba...@gmail.com> writes:
[...]
> Then, do you mean that line-map falls under the reach of the
> diagnostics maintainer? I agree, but Dodji himself does not seem to be
> sure about this:
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-10/msg02444.html
I have already reviewed that line-map patch. But as I thought Tom, the
FE maintainers and the global maintainers were the qualified person to
actually approve the patch, I didn't want to act beyond my prerogatives.
Jeff Law <l...@redhat.com> writes:
> If the front-end maintainers think Dodji is the best person to handle
> this stuff, and Dodji is willing, then I think we should make add the
> linemap stuff to Dodji's plate.
Hey Jeff,
FWIW, I am willing to help with the line map sub-system, of course.
Thank you for your confidence.
Cheers,
--
Dodji
