On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 03:11:16PM +0100, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> The missing definition in system's /usr/include/linux/types.h is protected
> with:
>
> typedef __u16 __bitwise __le16;
> typedef __u16 __bitwise __be16;
> typedef __u32 __bitwise __le32;
> typedef __u32 __bitwise __be32;
> #if defined(__GNUC__) && !defined(__STRICT_ANSI__)
> typedef __u64 __bitwise __le64;
> typedef __u64 __bitwise __be64;
> #endif
>
> which doesn't work with -std=c++11, but works without problems with
> -std=gnu++11.
>
> As proposed by Jakub at [1], -std=gnu++11 fixes the problem with old
> kernels. Attached patch implements this proposal.
>
> 2014-11-14 Uros Bizjak <[email protected]>
>
> * sanitizer_common/Makefile.am (AM_CXXFLAGS): Use -std=gnu++11.
> * asan/Makefile.am (AM_CXXFLAGS): Ditto.
> * lsan/Makefile.am (AM_CXXFLAGS): Ditto.
> * interception/Makefile.am (AM_CXXFLAGS): Ditto.
> * tsan/Makefile.am (AM_CXXFLAGS): Ditto.
> * libbacktrace/Makefile.am (AM_CXXFLAGS): Ditto.
> * ubsan/Makefile.am (AM_CXXFLAGS): Ditto.
> * sanitizer_common/Makefile.in: Regenerate.
> * asan/Makefile.in: Ditto.
> * lsan/Makefile.in: Ditto.
> * interception/Makefile.in: Ditto.
> * tsan/Makefile.in: Ditto.
> * libbacktrace/Makefile.in: Ditto.
> * ubsan/Makefile.in: Ditto.
Ok, thanks. Really no reason for pedantic checking.
Jakub
