> Ok.  If anyone has a better idea, feel free to suggest it.

Thanks, committed along with the same trivial patch for 
g++.dg/asan/large-func-test-1.C.

FX



2014-11-19  Francois-Xavier Coudert  <fxcoud...@gcc.gnu.org>

        PR sanitizer/63939
        * g++.dg/asan/large-func-test-1.C: Ajust dg-output.


Index: g++.dg/asan/large-func-test-1.C
===================================================================
--- g++.dg/asan/large-func-test-1.C     (revision 217694)
+++ g++.dg/asan/large-func-test-1.C     (working copy)
@@ -42,4 +42,4 @@ int main() {
 // { dg-output "\[^\n\r]*0x\[0-9a-f\]+ is located 44 bytes to the right of 
400-byte region.*(\n|\r\n|\r)" }
 // { dg-output "\[^\n\r]*allocated by thread T0 here:\[^\n\r]*(\n|\r\n|\r)" }
 // { dg-output "    #0( 0x\[0-9a-f\]+ (in 
_*(interceptor_|)malloc|\[(\])\[^\n\r]*(\n|\r\n|\r)" }
-// { dg-output "    #1|) 0x\[0-9a-f\]+ (in (operator 
new|_*_Zn\[aw\]\[mj\])|\[(\])\[^\n\r]*(\n|\r\n|\r)" }
+// { dg-output "    #1|) 0x\[0-9a-f\]+ (in (operator 
new|(wrap|)_*_Zn\[aw\]\[mj\])|\[(\])\[^\n\r]*(\n|\r\n|\r)" }

Reply via email to