> From: Trevor Saunders <[email protected]>
>
> Hi,
>
> In this pr we have a section attribute being applied to something in a comdat
> group. Since its ok for things to be in a comdat group and have an implicit
> section it seems it should also be fine to have a section from the attribute.
>
> bootstrapped + regtested x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, ok?
>
> Trev
>
> gcc/
>
> * symtab.c (symtab_node::verify): Check for section attribute before
> asserting something isn't in a section and a comdat group.
OK (if Jason is happy about user defined comdat sections, I am happy too ;)
Honza
>
> diff --git a/gcc/symtab.c b/gcc/symtab.c
> index 29839e6..0535670 100644
> --- a/gcc/symtab.c
> +++ b/gcc/symtab.c
> @@ -1102,7 +1102,8 @@ symtab_node::verify_base (void)
> error_found = true;
> }
> if (get_section () && get_comdat_group ()
> - && !implicit_section)
> + && !implicit_section
> + && !lookup_attribute ("section", DECL_ATTRIBUTES (decl)))
> {
> error ("Both section and comdat group is set");
> error_found = true;
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ipa/pr63621.C
> b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ipa/pr63621.C
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..c8262b8
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ipa/pr63621.C
> @@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
> +// { dg-do compile }
> + class A
> +{
> + public:
> + int __attribute__((section("a"))) f1(bool);
> + int f2(void *);
> + int f3(bool);
> +};
> +
> +inline int A::f1(bool b)
> +{
> + static int c;
> + if (c)
> + ;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +inline int A::f3(bool b)
> +{
> + static __attribute__((section(""))) int c;
> + if (c)
> + ;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +int A::f2(void *c)
> +{
> + return f1(c) + f3(c);
> +}
> --
> 2.1.3
