gcc  

Messages by Date

• 2025/09/15 Re: Regenerating *.opt.urls doesn't do anything Arsen Arsenović via Gcc
• 2025/09/15 Re: Clarification about RTL shifts semantics Christophe Lyon via Gcc
• 2025/09/15 Regenerating *.opt.urls doesn't do anything Thomas Koenig via Gcc
• 2025/09/15 Re: Clarification about RTL shifts semantics Richard Biener via Gcc
• 2025/09/14 Re: Sourceware Together; Open Office Friday 16:00 UTC Mark Wielaard
• 2025/09/14 Re: negative indexes H.J. Lu via Gcc
• 2025/09/14 GNU Tools Weekly News Week 3 (September 14, 2025) GNU Tools weekly via Gcc
• 2025/09/14 negative indexes Paul Edwards via Gcc
• 2025/09/13 gcc-15-20250913 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• 2025/09/13 Re: Bugzilla incorrectly requests to select product Rainer Orth via Gcc
• 2025/09/12 gcc-14-20250912 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• 2025/09/12 Re: RISC-V nightly performance testing of GCC on SPEC CPU 2017 Robin Dapp via Gcc
• 2025/09/12 Re: RISC-V nightly performance testing of GCC on SPEC CPU 2017 Luke Lau via Gcc
• 2025/09/12 RISC-V nightly performance testing of GCC on SPEC CPU 2017 Luke Lau via Gcc
• 2025/09/11 Re: aarch64 - testing Martin Uecker via Gcc
• 2025/09/11 Re: Clarification about RTL shifts semantics Richard Biener via Gcc
• 2025/09/11 Re: Clarification about RTL shifts semantics Richard Sandiford
• 2025/09/11 gcc-13-20250911 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• 2025/09/11 Re: Clarification about RTL shifts semantics Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
• 2025/09/11 Re: Clarification about RTL shifts semantics Richard Biener via Gcc
• 2025/09/09 Re: Attribute for custom memset function Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• 2025/09/09 Re: Attribute for custom memset function Florian Weimer via Gcc
• 2025/09/09 Re: Attribute for custom memset function Andrew Pinski via Gcc
• 2025/09/09 Re: Attribute for custom memset function Chris Packham via Gcc
• 2025/09/09 Re: Attribute for custom memset function NightStrike via Gcc
• 2025/09/09 Sourceware Together; Open Office Friday 16:00 UTC Mark Wielaard
• 2025/09/09 Re: Build error on master branch Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
• 2025/09/09 Build error on master branch Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
• 2025/09/09 Re: Build error on master branch Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
• 2025/09/09 Re: Build error on master branch Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• 2025/09/09 Re: Inconsistencies in docs for -Wall and -Wextra warnings Sandra Loosemore
• 2025/09/09 Inconsistencies in docs for -Wall and -Wextra warnings Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• 2025/09/08 Re: Bugzilla incorrectly requests to select product Mark Wielaard
• 2025/09/08 Cvvvvvv Keith Suhr via Gcc
• 2025/09/08 Bugzilla incorrectly requests to select product Rainer Orth via Gcc
• 2025/09/08 GCC Compiler 11.2.0 Issue List Manoj Tiwari via Gcc
• 2025/09/08 Attribute for custom memset function Chris Packham via Gcc
• 2025/09/07 GNU Tools Weekly News Week 2 (September 7, 2025) GNU Tools weekly via Gcc
• 2025/09/07 gcc-16-20250907 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• 2025/09/07 [no subject] Mohammed EL Faouatih via Gcc
• 2025/09/06 gcc-15-20250906 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• 2025/09/06 Re: C++ vs. -ftrivial-auto-var-init= vs. vacuous initialization & jumps Jason Merrill via Gcc
• 2025/09/05 gcc-14-20250905 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• 2025/09/05 OpenMP team start overhead for non-nested and cached team Matthew Malcomson via Gcc
• 2025/09/04 gcc-13-20250904 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• 2025/09/04 Re: Weekly news letter about GNU toolchain Adhemerval Zanella Netto via Gcc
• 2025/09/04 Re: Weekly news letter about GNU toolchain Andrew Pinski via Gcc
• 2025/09/04 Re: C++ vs. -ftrivial-auto-var-init= vs. vacuous initialization & jumps Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
• 2025/09/03 Weekly news letter for GNU toolchain: Week 1 (August 31, 2025) GNU Tools weekly via Gcc
• 2025/09/03 Re: Weekly news letter for GNU toolchain: Week 1 (August 31, 2025) GNU Tools weekly via Gcc
• 2025/09/03 Re: Weekly news letter about GNU toolchain Andrew Pinski via Gcc
• 2025/09/03 Re: Weekly news letter about GNU toolchain Mark Wielaard
• 2025/09/03 Re: is there any GCC plugin extracting call graph information? Basile Starynkevitch
• 2025/09/03 Re: C++ vs. -ftrivial-auto-var-init= vs. vacuous initialization & jumps Qing Zhao via Gcc
• 2025/09/03 is there any GCC plugin extracting call graph information? Basile Starynkevitch
• 2025/09/03 Re: C++ vs. -ftrivial-auto-var-init= vs. vacuous initialization & jumps Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
• 2025/09/03 Re: C++ vs. -ftrivial-auto-var-init= vs. vacuous initialization & jumps Qing Zhao via Gcc
• 2025/09/03 Re: C++ vs. -ftrivial-auto-var-init= vs. vacuous initialization & jumps Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
• 2025/09/03 Re: New AArch64 maintainers and reviewers appointed Kyrylo Tkachov via Gcc
• 2025/09/03 Re: git repo locked? Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• 2025/09/03 Re: git repo locked? Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• 2025/09/03 Re: git repo locked? Richard Biener via Gcc
• 2025/09/03 Re: git repo locked? Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
• 2025/09/02 Re: git repo locked? Andre Vehreschild via Gcc
• 2025/09/02 Re: git repo locked? Andre Vehreschild via Gcc
• 2025/09/02 Re: git repo locked? Andre Vehreschild via Gcc
• 2025/09/02 Re: C++ vs. -ftrivial-auto-var-init= Qing Zhao via Gcc
• 2025/09/02 Re: Providing more precise "excess errors" message in DejaGnu Pedro Alves
• 2025/09/02 Re: C++ vs. -ftrivial-auto-var-init= Jason Merrill via Gcc
• 2025/09/02 Re: git repo locked? Richard Biener via Gcc
• 2025/09/02 Re: git repo locked? Andre Vehreschild via Gcc
• 2025/09/02 Re: git repo locked? Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
• 2025/09/02 git repo locked? Rainer Orth via Gcc
• 2025/09/01 Re: We need to remove the Sphinx HTML docs Gerald Pfeifer
• 2025/09/01 Re: We need to remove the Sphinx HTML docs Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• 2025/09/01 Re: Providing more precise "excess errors" message in DejaGnu Jeff Law via Gcc
• 2025/09/01 Re: We need to remove the Sphinx HTML docs Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• 2025/09/01 Re: Providing more precise "excess errors" message in DejaGnu Christophe Lyon via Gcc
• 2025/09/01 Re: Providing more precise "excess errors" message in DejaGnu Richard Earnshaw (lists) via Gcc
• 2025/09/01 C++ vs. -ftrivial-auto-var-init= Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
• 2025/08/31 gcc-16-20250831 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• 2025/08/31 Re: We need to remove the Sphinx HTML docs Gerald Pfeifer
• 2025/08/31 Re: We need to remove the Sphinx HTML docs Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• 2025/08/30 Re: DejaGnu structured logs Jacob Bachmeyer via Gcc
• 2025/08/30 Re: Providing more precise "excess errors" message in DejaGnu Jacob Bachmeyer via Gcc
• 2025/08/30 Re: DejaGnu structured logs Jacob Bachmeyer via Gcc
• 2025/08/30 Re: We need to remove the Sphinx HTML docs Gerald Pfeifer
• 2025/08/30 Re: We need to remove the Sphinx HTML docs Gerald Pfeifer
• 2025/08/30 Weekly news letter about GNU toolchain Andrew Pinski via Gcc
• 2025/08/30 gcc-15-20250830 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• 2025/08/30 Re: DejaGnu structured logs David Malcolm via Gcc
• 2025/08/30 Re: Providing more precise "excess errors" message in DejaGnu David Malcolm via Gcc
• 2025/08/30 Re: DejaGnu structured logs Rob Savoye via Gcc
• 2025/08/29 Re: DejaGnu structured logs (was: Providing more precise "excess errors" message in DejaGnu) Jacob Bachmeyer via Gcc
• 2025/08/29 gcc-14-20250829 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• 2025/08/29 Re: Providing more precise "excess errors" message in DejaGnu Christophe Lyon via Gcc
• 2025/08/29 Re: Providing more precise "excess errors" message in DejaGnu Richard Earnshaw via Gcc
• 2025/08/29 Re: Providing more precise "excess errors" message in DejaGnu Richard Earnshaw via Gcc
• 2025/08/29 Re: Providing more precise "excess errors" message in DejaGnu Iain Sandoe
• 2025/08/28 Re: Providing more precise "excess errors" message in DejaGnu Jacob Bachmeyer via Gcc
• 2025/08/28 gcc-13-20250828 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• 2025/08/28 Re: Providing more precise "excess errors" message in DejaGnu Joseph Myers via Gcc
• 2025/08/28 Re: Providing more precise "excess errors" message in DejaGnu Sam James via Gcc
• 2025/08/28 Re: Providing more precise "excess errors" message in DejaGnu Rainer Orth via Gcc
• 2025/08/28 Re: Providing more precise "excess errors" message in DejaGnu Joseph Myers via Gcc
• 2025/08/28 Providing more precise "excess errors" message in DejaGnu Sam James via Gcc
• 2025/08/28 Re: Providing more precise "excess errors" message in DejaGnu Jeff Law via Gcc
• 2025/08/28 Re: Providing more precise "excess errors" message in DejaGnu Iain Sandoe
• 2025/08/28 Re: Providing more precise "excess errors" message in DejaGnu Thiago Jung Bauermann via Gcc
• 2025/08/28 Re: Providing more precise "excess errors" message in DejaGnu Richard Earnshaw (lists) via Gcc
• 2025/08/28 Re: Providing more precise "excess errors" message in DejaGnu Iain Sandoe
• 2025/08/28 Re: Providing more precise "excess errors" message in DejaGnu Jeff Law via Gcc
• 2025/08/28 Re: Providing more precise "excess errors" message in DejaGnu Richard Biener via Gcc
• 2025/08/27 Anubis for inbox.sourceware.org Mark Wielaard
• 2025/08/26 Re: DejaGnu fail despite equivalent output binaries Thomas de Bock via Gcc
• 2025/08/25 Re: Current ports without maintainers Jeff Law via Gcc
• 2025/08/25 Re: Current ports without maintainers Mark Wielaard
• 2025/08/25 Re: Current ports without maintainers Jeff Law via Gcc
• 2025/08/25 Re: Current ports without maintainers Richard Biener via Gcc
• 2025/08/24 gcc-16-20250824 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• 2025/08/24 Re: Current ports without maintainers Mark Wielaard
• 2025/08/24 Re: Current ports without maintainers Mark Wielaard
• 2025/08/24 Re: Current ports without maintainers Jeff Law via Gcc
• 2025/08/24 Re: Current ports without maintainers Joel Sherrill via Gcc
• 2025/08/24 Re: Current ports without maintainers Mark Wielaard
• 2025/08/23 gcc-15-20250823 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• 2025/08/22 gcc-14-20250822 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• 2025/08/21 Re: Condition coverage counters Sebastian Huber
• 2025/08/21 Re: Guidance on potential directions for contributing to GCC Sam James via Gcc
• 2025/08/21 Re: Guidance on potential directions for contributing to GCC Ujjwal Shekhar via Gcc
• 2025/08/21 gcc-13-20250821 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• 2025/08/21 Re: Guidance on potential directions for contributing to GCC Sam James via Gcc
• 2025/08/21 DejaGnu fail despite equivalent output binaries Thomas de Bock via Gcc
• 2025/08/21 Guidance on potential directions for contributing to GCC Ujjwal Shekhar via Gcc
• 2025/08/21 Re: DejaGnu fail despite equivalent output binaries Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• 2025/08/20 [no subject] Mohammed Alanazi via Gcc
• 2025/08/20 re follow up! zara join via Gcc
• 2025/08/20 Re: Messed up trunk branch on gcc-test on forge Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• 2025/08/20 Re: Messed up trunk branch on gcc-test on forge Claudio Bantaloukas via Gcc
• 2025/08/19 Re: Messed up trunk branch on gcc-test on forge Mark Wielaard
• 2025/08/19 Messed up trunk branch on gcc-test on forge Andrew Pinski via Gcc
• 2025/08/19 GNU Tools Cauldron 2025 - We are almost there! Jose E. Marchesi via Gcc
• 2025/08/18 Re: Condition coverage counters Jørgen Kvalsvik
• 2025/08/18 Re: Condition coverage counters Sebastian Huber
• 2025/08/18 Re: Condition coverage counters Jørgen Kvalsvik
• 2025/08/17 Condition coverage counters Sebastian Huber
• 2025/08/17 gcc-16-20250817 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• 2025/08/17 Re: Help with RTL/MD needed Jan Dubiec via Gcc
• 2025/08/16 gcc-15-20250816 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• 2025/08/15 gcc-14-20250815 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• 2025/08/14 gcc-13-20250814 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• 2025/08/13 Re: Current ports without maintainers Iain Sandoe
• 2025/08/13 Re: Current ports without maintainers Jeff Law via Gcc
• 2025/08/12 Re: Current ports without maintainers Richard Biener via Gcc
• 2025/08/12 Re: Current ports without maintainers Iain Sandoe
• 2025/08/12 Re: Current ports without maintainers Joseph Myers via Gcc
• 2025/08/12 Re: Current ports without maintainers Joel Sherrill via Gcc
• 2025/08/12 Re: Current ports without maintainers Jeff Law via Gcc
• 2025/08/12 Current ports without maintainers Andrew Pinski via Gcc
• 2025/08/11 Questions regarding exception handling capability when libgcc is statically linked Andras Lehotay-Kery via Gcc
• 2025/08/10 gcc-16-20250810 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• 2025/08/10 Re: Moving Sourceware Forward; Open Office 16:00 UTC Mark Wielaard
• 2025/08/09 gcc-15-20250809 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• 2025/08/08 gcc-14-20250808 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• 2025/08/08 Re: Help with comparison-merging optimization pass Thomas de Bock via Gcc
• 2025/08/08 Moving Sourceware Forward; Open Office 16:00 UTC Mark Wielaard
• 2025/08/08 unsubscribe Thomas Roeper (Nokia) via Gcc
• 2025/08/08 List-Unsubscribe: Christoph Jaschke via Gcc
• 2025/08/08 GCC 15.2 Released Richard Biener via Gcc
• 2025/08/08 GCC 15.2.1 Status Report (2025-08-08) Richard Biener via Gcc
• 2025/08/07 Re: what does -fsignaling-nans mean with -ffinite-math-only supplied also? Richard Biener via Gcc
• 2025/08/07 gcc-13-20250807 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• 2025/08/07 Re: GCC 15.2 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org jeevitha via Gcc
• 2025/08/07 Re: GCC 15.2 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org jeevitha via Gcc
• 2025/08/07 Re: Help with comparison-merging optimization pass Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
• 2025/08/07 Re: what does -fsignaling-nans mean with -ffinite-math-only supplied also? Toon Moene
• 2025/08/07 Re: what does -fsignaling-nans mean with -ffinite-math-only supplied also? Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
• 2025/08/07 what does -fsignaling-nans mean with -ffinite-math-only supplied also? Andrew Pinski (QUIC) via Gcc
• 2025/08/07 Re: Help with comparison-merging optimization pass Thomas de Bock via Gcc
• 2025/08/07 Re: Help with comparison-merging optimization pass H.J. Lu via Gcc
• 2025/08/07 Re: Help with comparison-merging optimization pass Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
• 2025/08/07 Re: Help with comparison-merging optimization pass Florian Weimer via Gcc
• 2025/08/07 Re: Help with comparison-merging optimization pass Thomas de Bock via Gcc
• 2025/08/06 Re: hard-reg constraints in md: spill fails from LRA Georg-Johann Lay via Gcc
• 2025/08/06 Re: Help with comparison-merging optimization pass Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
• 2025/08/06 Re: Help with comparison-merging optimization pass Thomas de Bock via Gcc
• 2025/08/06 Re: Help with comparison-merging optimization pass Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
• 2025/08/06 Re: Help with comparison-merging optimization pass Thomas de Bock via Gcc
• 2025/08/06 Re: Help with comparison-merging optimization pass Richard Biener via Gcc
• 2025/08/06 Re: Help with comparison-merging optimization pass Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
• 2025/08/05 Re: Help with comparison-merging optimization pass Richard Biener via Gcc
• 2025/08/05 Help with comparison-merging optimization pass Thomas de Bock via Gcc
• 2025/08/05 Re: hard-reg constraints in md: spill fails from LRA Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus via Gcc
• 2025/08/05 gccrs July 2025 Status Report Arthur Cohen
• 2025/08/05 About RTL and its origins Pierrick Philippe
• 2025/08/04 Re: hard-reg constraints in md: spill fails from LRA Georg-Johann Lay via Gcc
• 2025/08/04 hard-reg constraints in md: spill fails from LRA Georg-Johann Lay via Gcc
• 2025/08/03 Re: Help with RTL/MD needed Jeff Law via Gcc
• 2025/08/03 gcc-16-20250803 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• 2025/08/03 Re: Help with RTL/MD needed Jeff Law via Gcc

• Earlier messages