>>>>> "Joe" == Joe Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Joe> Georg Bauhaus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> | A busy-loop function is used to effect a delay, not too precise,
>> | but portably. Like
>> |
>> | #define COUNT 1000
>> |
>> | void f() { | /*volatile*/ /*register*/ int i;
>> |
>> | for (i = 0; i < COUNT; ++i)
>> | ;
Joe> On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 01:48:56AM +0200, Gabriel Dos Reis
Joe> wrote:
>> This must be an FAQ. The above is no way of (no matter how
>> popular the urban legend makes it) implementing delay. Adding a
>> #pragma just makes teh situation worse.
Joe> Unfortunately, where there is a good argument for not using
Joe> empty loops as busy-waits, at one time it was documented GCC
Joe> behavior that it would work, so we can't really blame the users
Joe> for trusting the doc.
Would this work:
for (i=0; i < foo; i++)
asm volatile ("");
Or perhaps with asm volatile ("":::"memory") instead?
paul
