Zack Weinberg wrote:
> "Dave Korn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>> No write perms mate! However I'll check out HEAD and do a
>>before-and-after testsuite run overnight, and get back to you in the morning
>>with the results (UK time). Will "--enable-languages=c,c++" be enough, or
>>do you want me to test against all default languages?
>
>
> For this, c/c++ should be fine.
Are you serious? Such a dangerous patch surely ought
to be fully regtested with all languages enabled and
*at* *least* using:
- a cc0 target
- a big-endian target
- a 64bit target
- the mmix and vax backends
- the new-ra branch
- the POOMA testsuite
:-)
--- gcc.c.orig 2005-04-12 18:05:46.803428200 +0100
+++ gcc.c 2005-04-12 18:06:28.230338800 +0100
@@ -954,7 +954,7 @@ static const struct compiler default_com
cc1 %(cpp_unique_options) %(cc1_options)}}\
%{!fsyntax-only:%(invoke_as)}}}}}}", 0, 1, 1},
{"-",
- "%{!E:%e-E required when input is from standard input}\
+ "%{!E:%e-E or -x required when input is from standard input}\
%(trad_capable_cpp) %(cpp_options) %(cpp_debug_options)", 0, 0, 0},
{".h", "@c-header", 0, 0, 0},
{"@c-header",
--
// Bernardo Innocenti - Develer S.r.l., R&D dept.
\X/ http://www.develer.com/
