On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 05:27:26PM -0400, Diego Novillo wrote: > > Do we gain anything over expanding this to the approprate __sync_foo > > builtin in the front end.? > > > Can the optimizers tell that this is an atomic builtin? If so, > then no, they're not necessary.
Sure, in the same way we know what "strlen" is. > That's what I thought at first, but the standard threw me into a > loop when it mentioned "id-expression" instead of just > "identifier" in the C++ case. If they're essentially the same, > then great. id-expression is a non-terminal from the iso c++ grammar. ;-) It means someone can write e.g. Class::static_member. As far as you are concerned it means DECL. > Yes. I was only referring to a single instance of reduction. ... > Yes, I tried to express that by putting common clauses in > data_clauses and have the various constructs reference it. Ah, you confused me. r~
