On Tue, 2005-05-17 at 00:10 +0200, Steven Bosscher wrote: > On Monday 16 May 2005 23:43, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > On Mon, 2005-05-16 at 10:42 -0400, Peter Barada wrote: > > > Until package maintainers take cross-compilation *seriously*, I have > > > no choice but to do native compilation of a large hunk of the packages > > > on eval boards that can literally takes *DAYS* to build. > > > > The most amazing fact to me is: Not even GCC seems to take cross- > > compilation seriously :( > > BS. Even the large disto builders do cross compilations a lot.
So I suppose you have these general crossbuilding PRs fixed in your sources: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21143 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21247 Another one I haven't filed yet, is GCC-4.x not correctly propagating CFLAGS/CFLAGS_FOR_{BUILD|HOST|TARGET} to newlib in one-tree builds (I am still investigating). All these to me are strong indications that GCC-4.x has been poorly tested in cross compilation. Ralf