On Tue, 2005-05-17 at 00:10 +0200, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> On Monday 16 May 2005 23:43, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > On Mon, 2005-05-16 at 10:42 -0400, Peter Barada wrote:
> > > Until package maintainers take cross-compilation *seriously*, I have
> > > no choice but to do native compilation of a large hunk of the packages
> > > on eval boards that can literally takes *DAYS* to build.
> >
> > The most amazing fact to me is: Not even GCC seems to take cross-
> > compilation seriously :(
> 
> BS.  Even the large disto builders do cross compilations a lot.

So I suppose you have these general crossbuilding PRs fixed in your
sources:

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21143

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21247

Another one I haven't filed yet, is GCC-4.x not correctly propagating
CFLAGS/CFLAGS_FOR_{BUILD|HOST|TARGET} to newlib in one-tree builds (I am
still investigating).

All these to me are strong indications that GCC-4.x has been poorly
tested in cross compilation.

Ralf


Reply via email to