Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Sun, 2005-05-22 at 02:14 +0200, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
| > Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >
| > | While moving FIELD_DECL to it's own substruct, the following questions
| > | have come up. I figured one of you might know:
| > |
| > | 1. Do we need DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME on FIELD_DECL? I can't think of a
| > | place where we would actually try to *output* a FIELD_DECL directly, but
| > | maybe i've missed something. I ask because the C frontend tests
| > | decl_assembler_name on field decl, but never sets it on them.
| >
| >
| > What happens when you have this (in C++)
| >
| > namespace foo {
| > union {
| > int baz;
| > double foobar;
| > } bar;
| > };
| >
|
| I tried this, and it still doesn't access DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME of
| FIELD_DECL.
OK, that is the corner case that comes to my mind where C++ directly
specifies linkage for FIELD_DECL. Maybe Jason or Mark might further
comments.
-- Gaby
