Mark Mitchell wrote: > It's certainly well-known here -- but that's not to say it shouldn't > go in some nice FSF-ish place as well in case somebody else wants to > work on it.
Probably it's obvious but indeed, we already noticed that this is also
*the* bottleneck for the compile-time performance on some template-heavy
TR1 facilities:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-03/msg02151.html
Paolo.
