Scott Robert Ladd wrote:
No, what they do is redefine the bug such that it is no longer a bug. Certain U.S. Presidents are quite fond of this tactic, recategorizing things to avoid dealing with them. Bug 323 is an example of how GCC does this.
I don't know of any example of this. That is a case where something is clearly a non-conformance with the language definition, and has been declared not a bug.
