Paul Schlie wrote:
Upon a potential integer overflow of either it's min or max range, shouldn't the result be set to [min:type-min-value, max:type-max-value], without the necessity of any further designations?
No.[10, INT_MAX] + [ 1, 1 ] == [ 11, INT_MAX ] because of the famous signed int overflow definition in the C standard.
[10U, UINT_MAX] + [ 1U, 1U ] == ~[ 1U, 10U ] Paolo
