Re: Do C++ signed types have modulo semantics?

[Michael Veksler]

Nathan Sidwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 28/06/2005 18:48:26:

>
> why are you talking about one's complement in the context of gcc.  From
> implement-c.texi
>
>    @cite{Whether signed integer types are represented using sign and
magnitude,
>    two's complement, or one's complement, and whether the extraordinary
value
>    is a trap representation or an ordinary value (C99 6.2.6.2).}
>
>    GCC supports only two's complement integer types, and all bit patterns
>    are ordinary values.
>
> please stop considering non 2's complement stuff.
>

Sorry, did not realize this was documented this way.
Is "implement-c.texi" part of the user visible documentation, or is it
targeted for gcc developers?

  Michael