> What do others think about this patch? If people think, it is OK > to have one additional knob for users then I'll test and submit > formal patch. > > I'll treat silence as, this idea is not OK for FSF GCC. I'd like to > give Jason and our customers compiler with such fix ASAP. And if > it is considered good idea for FSF GCC then I'd like to iron out > small details (e.g. name of switch, stabs specific or general for > all dbg format etc..), in the beginning.
I think it's useful, probably in the same vein as the -feliminate-dwarf-dup etc switches. Probably should use the same type of naming convention too. -eric
