Daniel Berlin wrote: > Thinking harder about it, you might be better off then making > everything based on TYPE_SIZE then, since we don't always have the > FIELD_DECL's handy. [...] > i meant in tree-ssa-structalias.c. The results you get by doing this > should be fine.
Oh, OK. Will look into this. I see a couple of references to bitpos_of_field which might require a bit of care. Thanks for your feedback. Olivier
