Joe Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 03:12:30PM +0200, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
| > Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >
| > [...]
| >
| > | I have absolutely no reason to expect the feedback process to change if
| > | we waited. I have absolutely no reason to believe this won't happen
| > | again when svn 1.4 comes out.
| >
| > So why are people asked to voice their opinions if there is so much
| > distrust?
|
| I did not see any implication of "distrust" in Daniel's message.
|
| I was the one who asked for opinions (actually, I believed that I asked
| for concerns and objections, which is slightly different).
In his initial message at the root of this thread, Daniel Berlin
asked:
5. Lastly, just to be clear, if you guys don't think the benefits
outweigh the costs, we don't have to move. So far, the amount of
dissent i've heard is pretty small, but please, if you don't
want to move (or you do), please speak up, instead of silently
suffering (or silently being in joy).
I took that as an expression to build consensus about making something
happens for real. I wholeheartly applauded that.
However, I was not expecting labelling.
We could debate at length about the difference between "voicing
opinions" and "speaking up, instead of silently suffering", but I
doubt that would solve the issues raised here.
| Ideally, we could address the concerns and achieve consensus, but in a
| group as large as the one we have, I don't think unanimity can be
| achieved.
I'm not after a 100% unanimity; however, there is ample room for broad
consensus. And I do hope we come up with something real with lower
barrier.
-- Gaby
