Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > Jeffrey A Law <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >>We clearly disagree then. Though my 15+ years of working with GCC I've >>seen far more complaints about false positives than missing instances >>of this warning. > > > I think that most of the false positives are of the form > > int x, f, y; > f = foo (); > if (f) > x = 1; > y = g (); > if (f) > y = x; > return y; > > Here presumably we can all agree that gcc ideally should not warn that > x may be used uninitialized.
Indeed; I definitely agree that we shouldn't warn about this. The users have spoken definitively, if nothing else. -- Mark Mitchell CodeSourcery, LLC [EMAIL PROTECTED] (916) 791-8304
