Ian Lance Taylor <ian@airs.com> wrote:
> In general, yes. But looking at it we should probably only call
> copy_to_reg if TARGET is not itself a pseudo-register.
>
> And I think I would put the new code before the "TARGET and VALREG
> cannot be equal" comment.
>
> That patch is OK if it works and passes testing, and if you add a test
> case and a ChangeLog entry.
I'll come up to gcc-patches with the patch which incorporates your
suggestions and a testcase after the tests.
Thanks for suggestions.
Regards,
kaz
